Heart healthful arguing

A New York Times article (login required) by Tara Parker-Pope reports on research that reveals a link between your style of marital arguing and your health. Do you vent your feelings, or do you bottle them up? Choose well or reap the health consequences.

So be careful how you live. Don’t live like fools, but like those who are wise. Make the most of every opportunity in these evil days. Don’t act thoughtlessly, but understand what the Lord wants you to do. Don’t be drunk with wine, because that will ruin your life…

And further, submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. (Ephesians 5:15–21)

A ten-year study (published in Psycosomatic Medicine) of 4,000 men and women asked whether they vented their feelings or kept quiet in arguments with their spouse. Feelings were bottled up by 32% of the men and 23% of the women. It turns out how men dealt with the arguments (let it out or bottle it up) had no measureable effect on their health. On the other hand, women who self-silenced in marital arguments were 4 times as likely to die as those who were open with their feelings.

So stop telling lies. Let us tell our neighbors the truth, for we are all parts of the same body. And “don’t sin by letting anger control you.” Don’t let the sun go down while you are still angry, for anger gives a foothold to the devil. (Ephesians 4:25–27)

Another study at the University of Utah measured the effect of emotional tone that men and women use in arguments. A warm-fuzzy style of arguing (by either spouse) lowered the wife’s risk of heart disease, although it made no difference in the husband’s heart health.

For husbands, this means love your wives, just as Christ loved the church. (Ephesians 5:25)

… Don’t use foul or abusive language. Let everything you say be good and helpful, so that your words will be an encouragement to those who hear them.

… Get rid of all bitterness, rage, anger, harsh words, and slander, as well as all types of evil behavior. Instead, be kind to each other, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, just as God through Christ has forgiven you. (Ephesians 4:29–32)

What increased the heart risks for a man is if the disagreements involved a battle for control, regardless of which one made the controlling statements.

For wives, this means submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For a husband is the head of his wife as Christ is the head of the church. He is the Savior of his body, the church. As the church submits to Christ, so you wives should submit to your husbands in everything. (Ephesians 5:22–24)

What’s interesting is that the study looked at the quality of the marriage relationship and found no good correlation to cardiovascular risk. The higher cardiovascular risk only correlated with the couple’s bickering style.

Santa Cruz half-day and an event

Karen and I drove over to Santa Cruz for the afternoon and did some hiking and caching in Wilder Ranch State Park. At sunset we dropped in on the Sand and Smores event. Very few of my acquaintances were there and Karen felt out of place so we didn’t stay long. We ate dinner in a pleasant little restaurant called Tortilla Flats in Soquel.

Why are you still here?

A couple of days ago, a group of us were visiting with a prospective new leader in our church and discussing the issues surrounding the migration of a number of families away from our church in recent months. He asked why we were still here. Someone joked that we’re the lazy ones, rolling along with inertia, unwilling to make an effort to change. But that’s definitely not it. There’s a mega-church nearby, with all the attractiveness and excellence that such a large church can support. In some sense, it takes effort to not go there. I responded with what I learned from a wise pastor a long time ago when I asked him for advice on making a decision to change from my failing church to his alive and growing church. He said, “It’s not about where you can receive the best from a church, it’s where you can serve the best.” Another guy said it was no secret he’s a short-timer in town, so he knows there’s no long-term commitment to our church, but leadership here “is something I have to do.” That was his way of stating what was true for all us in the conversation—we perceive God has called us to serve here, and here we’ll stay until it’s clear God wants us somewhere else.

The fact that people so easily decide to leave a church when they become unhappy or discouraged is a result of the “I” culture and our failure as leaders to teach the biblical basis for what a church is and how it works. A few months ago, John Johnson wrote about “iChurch” on his blog, although perhaps the concept is more accurately “I-church.” Johnson says,

Sometimes I feel like our church is just one more brand out there. And I wonder if we have moved from a Christianity that was about relinquishing our desires, submitting to a community, learning to accept the blemishes and love those God has called us to love—to a Christianity that is all about meeting my needs, providing choices, and leaving if change does not happen on my timeline.

In the process of making our church attractive and non-threatening to visitors and the unchurched, we must remember to teach that church is a place to love and serve, not a place to consume for our neediness and be entertained. As Johnson says,

…the point of joining is to enter a covenant. A covenant that says, for better or worse, this is the body God has placed me in, and I will love the people and submit myself to those God has called to lead, and I will unleash my gifts, and I will sit at the table with everyone else and lead the church forward. And if things are not where they should be, I will stay at it until they are, or until God shows me differently.