Expositional or topical preaching?

I find I resonate with the mission statement of Vintage Faith Church in Santa Cruz, “we are becoming a worshipful community of missional theologians.” While our church will not likely have a vision statement like that, I hope ours will not be in disagreement. In this post, I’d like to focus on the “theologian” portion. Pastor Dan Kimball of VFC explains that their use of the word does not mean everyone should be like an academic theologian, but simply a person who is well versed in the study of the nature of God and inquires into religious questions.

While our church works towards developing an all-encompassing vision, we have already identified a set of goals to work toward. One of the major goals is to develop a strategic program for personal growth and maturity that includes a foundation of biblical knowledge and the essentials of our faith. This curriculum, of course, is simply a means to an end. The desired effect is for the members of the church community to learn and respond to the whole counsel of God as contained in the Bible. In other words, to be theologians in the sense described above.

Now, what is the most effective way to accomplish that through preaching—through topical or expository sermons? You might be inclined to say either, since there are good examples of growing churches using each method. However, I think each method addresses different needs and produces different results.

I think topical sermons tend to be remedial in nature. That is, the pastor sees a need to teach on a particular issue in order to bring about right thinking in the members. More than that, topical sermons advertise well and make it easy for members to invite seekers to come hear a common life-issue discussed.

While topical sermons are remedial, I think expository sermons are preventative, equipping the members to think and act biblically and so accomplish the work Christ has called His church to do. Ray Stedman, an expositional preacher who was important in the formation of my faith, believed that poor topical preaching leads to widespread biblical illiteracy. In “The Primacy of Preaching” he wrote:

Many persons in the average congregation do not know the meaning of terms like justification by faith, or sanctification, or the kingdom of God, or the new covenant, or the walk in the Spirit, the flesh, or even faith, love, and peace! Worse yet, because they don’t know the biblical meaning of “flesh”, for instance, they do not know how to recognize it in themselves, and the flesh therefore rages in unrestrained destructiveness throughout their thinking and living. Because they know nothing of the nature of the new covenant, they live continually in the legal bondages of the old. Because they do not understand the wisdom of God, they succumb constantly to the pompous pretensions of the wisdom of the world. Because they do not know how to use the shield of faith, they are besieged daily by the fiery darts of the wicked one.

Nevertheless, an examination of Stedman’s sermon library shows he found the need to occasionally teach topically (and remedially, as he does in Tell It To The Church, a message on church discipline). But, mostly his sermon series are organized by books of the Bible. The expositional teaching model is, I think, the most effective method of imparting to church members a foundation of biblical knowledge and the essentials of the Christian faith.

Christianity has an image problem

It’s obvious that elements of our society are becoming resistant or even hostile to Christianity, but what may not be obvious is the depth of such resistance nor what the future portends as a result. A new study by Barna Research gives fact-based insight into this topic and is discussed in a new book by David Kinnaman entitled “unChristian.”

The study determined that in the age group of 16 to 29 year-olds (the primary focus of the study), 40% do not consider themselves to be Christian (that’s roughly 24 million people). By comparison, the 42 to 60 year-old group has 27% who do not consider themselves Christian. So how do the 16 to 29 year-olds outside of Christianity perceive Christianity and two important sub-groups, evangelical Christians and born-again Christians?

First of all, 43% of the group were not aware of evangelical Christianity, while 14% were not aware of (and therefore had no opinions on) born-again Christians. Of those who had awareness of the terms, 49% had a bad impression of evangelical Christians, while 35% had a bad impression of born-again Christians. Conversely, only 3% had a good impression of evangelical Christians and 10% had a good impression of born-again Christians.

How is it that evangelical Christians, whose professed goal is to spread the “good news” of Jesus Christ, and who (at least claim to) reflect His love to others, are thought of so negatively? The study summarized the various impressions as follows: “Christians have become famous for what they oppose, rather than who they are for.” The common themes were that Christians are hypocritical, too focused on getting converts, anti-homosexual, too political, and judgmental.

If you are a Christian, and you love God and you love people (and you should because Jesus said these were the greatest commandments), then you will not dismiss these perceptions. Losing a generation is a terrible price to pay for our failure.

You can read more about this study in this Barna Update.

Trick or Treat

Dan and I did Trick or Treat on Shell Ridge today. We had attempted it a few months ago, but missing stages prevented us from completing it. It is a multi-cache with two options at each stage. One option leads to a dead-end (trick), while the other leads on to the completion. Team Alamo will archive it (he says) at the end of the month, and has provided the coordinates of every waypoint. While this was a clever idea for a cache, it must have been a maintenance nightmare. We visited every coordinate, and found that indeed several stages were still missing (or at least we couldn’t find them).